After visiting the VISCOM 2017 in Düsseldorf, I show here some of my design ideas for facades and Interiors of modern architecture with the use of Smart FOILS or (AM)OLED Technology.The latest technical developments at the CES 2018 show, that it is now possible to create such flexible facades and interiors.
You can watch this Video also on my YouTube channel .
This bag is meant for the ageless Birds
of Paradise that tap a toe or two to the Hip Pop Deep Rap Hop House music of
the day. Highly individualistic, they're ready to break all the
"rules" in Fashion.The only thing that matters is : How do I feel
when I carry this Glamorous,Vibrant, Luxury Bag and do my girlfriends want to
steal it from me ?
Now that fashion and accessories on the catwalks of the fashion
capitals and in the fashion hotspots of the world are more colorful
then ever, the time is exactly right for my unique designs. I´m looking
for a cooperation with Color Thinking Creatives to produce
my New Glam Color Bags and offer them on the global market.
One of my great challenges as a designer and artist is COLOR and the energetic and dynamic effect it has on people. I´ve developed a method to create endless harmonious color combinations in dynamic structures.In my videos below I give you an idea, of what I mean. I´m looking for cooperation partners to create beautiful and colorful products together such as handbags, shoes, accessories, carpets, wallpaper,jewlery and modern communication devices. I´m also thinking of the combination of color and glass: glass finishing as a part of the architecture of a building or in the interior design of its rooms; corporate colors,or the surface design of the smart e-cars of the near future. The possible applications are endless. Another idea is the combination of COLOR and TECHNIC. Smart bags and clothes that change colors depending on the mood of the person that carries / wears them. Smart buildings, the interior as well as the facades, change colors depending on the time of the day or the season to have a positive effect on the well-being of the people. I look forward to hear from you !
Sliding in a split second like a wizard on the screen of my smartphone with my finger, that´s how I´ve made these Doodles All you see is me. Selfies of my Subconcious,in different moods,with different gestures and in different postures.
THE IMPORTANCE OF DOODLING
The art of drawing which is of more real importance to the human race than that of writing... should be taught to every child just as writing is,” declared John Ruskin, one of the most prolific writers of the 19th century. The Campaign For Drawing, a British charity established a decade ago on the centenary of Ruskin's death, duly works to raise the profile of drawing for all ages. The idea is that drawing is an essential and woefully underestimated tool for thinking about and engaging with the world.
Drawing is “making marks with meaning," explains Sue Grayson Ford, director of the Campaign For Drawing. It is an art form but also a communication device, used by architects, archaeologists and mathematicians, as well as artists, cartoonists and regular people. From doodles to murals to blueprints, it is how humans communicated before the invention of language, and it continues to succeed where language often fails. Indeed, it is “the best tool we have for understanding and communicating,” says Ms Grayson Ford. (http://moreintelligentlife.com/blog/importance-doodling)
Martin Vieweg and Nancy Seifer wrote in 2008: "One of the most enduring metaphors for the spiritual path is the transformation of the lowly catepillar into a butterfly. Out of its own substance, the ground-hugging grub weaves the medium for its metamorphosis—the chrysalis within which it evolves into a beautiful creature with wings. The human being undergoes an equally dramatic transformation, unfolding the path to liberation from within the depths of the soul and emerging, after great struggle, as an expression of divinity in the world." TRANSFORMATION
The Goal of the Spiritual Path
"The word “transformation” first became popular during the 1960s and 70s as the new wave of spirituality began to emerge. For "new-agers," it was a word associated with spiritual awakening, though its deeper meaning awaited experience. By the 80s and 90s, the word became a trendy synonym for change in the corporate world, and by the start of the new millennium it had entered the lexicon of government agencies, most notably the Pentagon. The spiritual sense of the word was all but dead and buried during those years. In the wisdom teachings, transformation is the process by which the human being becomes a spiritual being. It involves a metamorphosis that begins when the soul in incarnation awakens to its spiritual essence, after lifetimes of immersion in matter, and discovers the path of return to its Source. Along the way, the individual who was identified with the outer persona—the body, emotions, and mind—gradually becomes identified with the Soul, the true or higher Self. As the path of transformation unfolds, the persona becomes the reflection of the light and love of the soul........" Read more on: http://whenthesoulawakens.org/the-path-of-transformation_268.html
Weiß ist die Summe aller
Farben des Lichts und damit die Vollkommenste. Aus Ihr lasse ich meine Bilder
hervor gehen und mit ihr setze ich Akzente.
Zu jeder Zeit haben Künstler bei der Umsetzung Ihrer kreativen Ideen gebrauch
gemacht von den neuesten technischen Errungenschaften und sich von den letzten
Stand der Wissenschaft inspirieren lassen. Umgekehrt hatte Ihr freies und
unkonventionelles Denken die Forscher und Wissenschaftler beeinflusst. Ich habe
meine Wahrnehmung im Laufe der Jahren immer weiter verfeinert und
sensibilisiert, sodass ich jetzt mit Hilfe neuer Technologien und durch immer
"neues" sehen so zu sagen die Unendlichkeit in meinen Fingerspitzen
habe. Die Erkundung der Multi-Dimensionen hat begonnen.
Auf der Homepage von K20
fand ich folgenden Text: „Der weiße, freie Abgrund, die
Unendlichkeit liegt vor uns“, hatte Kasimir Malewitsch 1919 formuliert und
damit eine Metapher gebildet, die wegweisend für seine Kunst wurde. Die weiße
Fläche als Leere ist bei ihm der monochrome Grund, vor dem die geometrischen
Formen schwerelos zu schweben scheinen. Auf der Suche nach einer neuen Seinsgrundlage
des Menschen sah er in der weißen Suprematie die höchste Vollendung der
Gegenstandslosigkeit und verknüpfte sie mit idealistischem Gedankengut zum
radikalen Entwurf einer zukünftigen Gesellschaft. Für Wassily Kandinsky
markierten weiße Flächen einen Möglichkeitsraum; er sah im Weiß eine vielerlei
positive Möglichkeiten bergende Ursprungskraft der Evolution und geistigen
Erhöhung.
Der Evolutionsgedanke leitete auch Mondrians Interesse
an einer universalen Wahrheit, die er jenseits des Gegenständlichen vermutete.
In der radikalen Reduktion der Gestaltungselemente auf horizontale und
vertikale Linien sowie die drei Primärfarben Rot, Gelb und Blau (und in der
Gegenüberstellung hierzu die drei Nichtfarben Schwarz, Grau und Weiß)
entwickelte er sein neoplastizistisches System. Während Mondrian mit den drei
Primärfarben der Form und Materie Ausdruck verleihen wollte, bedeutete ihm die
Nichtfarbe Weiß zunächst die neutrale Fläche, später setzte er sie sinnbildlich
dem leeren Raum gleich.
In den Jahren zwischen 1880 und 1920 waren
Vorstellungen von einer unsichtbaren räumlichen, einer vierten Dimension nicht
nur unter Naturwissenschaftlern, Theosophen und Schriftstellern weit
verbreitet. Angeregt durch natur- und populärwissenschaftliche Schriften beschäftigten
sich auch Künstler mit den Konzepten dieser vierten Dimension, die sie mit
einer Erweiterung und Befreiung des Denkens und der Vorstellungskraft in
Verbindung brachten.
Gemeinsam waren sie der Überzeugung, dass hinter der
Grenze der menschlichen Wahrnehmung eine unsichtbare Realität existiere und
dass Künstler in diese vierte Dimension blicken und sie sichtbar machen
konnten. Die damaligen physikalischen Entdeckungen prägten ein neues Bild von
der Welt; dies erweiterte bei Künstlern wie Kandinsky, Malewitsch und Mondrian
den Vorstellungshorizont hin zu mehrdimensionalen, unendlichen kosmischen und
geistigen Weiten, die in den weißen Flächen ihrer Bilder Ausdruck fanden.
Abstract art dominates the fair as collectors seek
less flashy works and artists begin to update the form
By Charlotte Burns, Melanie Gerlis and Julia Michalska. From Art
Basel daily edition
Published online: 12 June 2013
Abstract art, the form that dominated the
20th century, once again reigns supreme at the 44th edition of Art Basel. As
the fair opened yesterday to the great, the rich and the famous—including the
man of the month, Massimiliano Gioni, the director of the Venice Biennale,
Russia’s power couple Roman Abramovich and Dasha Zhukova, and the actors
Leonardo DiCaprio and Lukas Haas—visitors were confronted with a variety of
non-representative, non-figurative art.
Historical pieces
by abstract pioneers include kinetic sculptures by Alexander Calder (such asBlue
Flower, Red Flower, 1975, at Tina Kim/Kukje, 2.0/F6, priced at $2.8m),
Minimalist wall pieces by Donald Judd (includingUntitled
(Ballantine 89-49), 1989, priced at $2.4m with David Zwirner, 2.0/F5)
and various large abstract works by Richter (a 1984 example is on show at
Richard Gray Gallery, 2.0/E4, priced at $6.5m; a piece from 1992 is on offer
with Dominique Lévy Gallery, 2.0/F4, for “under $20m”). In equal abundance are
works by contemporary artists who have taken on the abstract mantle, including
Christopher Wool (Untitled,
2001, at Luhring Augustine, 2.0/E13, $1.5m) and Albert Oehlen (FM44, 2011, which sold to a European
collector for €250,000 within hours of the fair’s opening at Galerie Max
Hetzler, 2.0/E7).
“The abstract abounds,” says Lisa Spellman, the founder of New York’s 303
Gallery (2.1/J21). She is showing non-figurative works priced between $150,000
and $250,000, including two large 2013 works by the gallery’s recently
recruited artist Jacob Kassay, which were bought together by a European private
collector, and six ceramic works by Nick Mauss, which sold for $23,000 each.
Sean Kelly (2.1/N2) designed his stand according to “different ideas of
abstraction”, centred around Joseph Kosuth’sTitled (Art as Idea as Idea), 1967,
priced at €100,000. “There’s a lot of really good [abstract] work being done
across all media right now—painting, photography, conceptual—and we wanted to
reflect that,” he says. New works on show include Callum Innes’sUntitled,
2013, a large oil and shellac canvas, which sold to a private US collector for
£50,000.
The artist Ad Reinhardt famously said that his 1960s “black” abstract works
marked the end of painting, but the abstract form “remains wide open to fresh
contributions”, says Robert Storr, the dean of the Yale University School of
Art, who is organising a Reinhardt exhibition for David Zwirner in New York
this November. It is “one of the great inventions of Modern art that is barely
a century old”—rather, it is “a century young”, he says.
Can today’s artist move the once-radical form in a new, meaningful direction?
“The problem is, there is a group of lower-tier abstract painters who are good
and whose work looks beautiful, but what they are bringing to the table in
terms of art history is nothing new. They are not adding to the conversation,”
says the New York-based art adviser Lisa Schiff.
She highlights exceptions whom she thinks are “making enough of a formal
innovation to stand alone”. These include the US artist Garth Weiser, whoseSedaka,
2013, sold for $55,000 to a private US collector within half an hour of the
fair’s opening at Casey Kaplan (2.1/N16). Massimo De Carlo (2.1/N3) has hung
three equal-sized abstract works by different artists next to each other, to
“explore the possibilities of abstract art”, says Flavio del Monte, the
gallery’s institutional relations manager. “We are bombarded by images
everywhere today, so it is important for artists to take some distance,” he
says. Loring Randolph, a director at Casey Kaplan, says: “The abstract is
always relevant; you can have a rhetoric behind it that can be whatever you
want.” Today’s practitioners, she says, “think about how the concept [of the abstract]
and the process can work together”.
Process is key: artists are experimenting with materials and technology that
were previously unavailable, to update the form. Denise René’s stand (2.0/D19)
includes works by the Brussels-based artist group LAb[au]. The pieces, such asParticle
Springs, 2011, priced at €27,000, use computer algorithms to create
moving, smoke-like patterns on monitors. Mitchell-Innes & Nash (2.0/E6) is
showing avant-garde masters such as Franz Kline (Provincetown II, 1959, around $10m) alongside younger artists
including Keltie Ferris (Laissez-Faire,
2013, $50,000), whose work is inspired by graffiti and digitalisation.
For some, abstract art provides the chance to explore art history in a new way.
At Galerie Nordenhake (2.1/P9), the 29-year-old artist Paul Fägerskiöld has
used spray paint to create a homage to both Jackson Pollock and the
Pointillists in his monochromeUntitled (Yellow), 2013, €25,000,
which sold to a private German museum. At Sperone Westwater (2.0/E10), Emil
Lukas’s thread-painting diptych panelsCurtain East and Curtain West, 2013,
which sold for $65,000, are influenced by Sol LeWitt.
The trend is market-led, too. The boom years were characterised by flashy,
self-explanatory art, but there has been a return to more thoughtful, abstract
forms such as those produced by artists within the European Zero group. “We
staged an exhibition of their work in 2008, which raised consciousness for an
American audience to whom the work seemed new. The response was strong and has
increased,” says Angela Westwater, the co-director of Sperone Westwater. The
gallery is showing works by artists associated with the group, including Lucio
Fontana’sConcetto spaziale,
1958, priced at around €1m, and Otto Piene’s 1975 oil and fire on canvas,Red
Matters, priced at €250,000. Meanwhile, post-recession records have been
achieved at auction for works by abstract artists, including the $43.8m paid
for Barnett Newman’sOnement VI, 1953, at Sotheby’s in New
York last month. “Collectors now want quieter, intellectual art with more
depth. The years of the loud, funny works are over,” says Bob van Orsouw
(2.1/P17), who is showing works including a wall sculpture by the Dutch
conceptual artist Ger van Elk (Los
Angeles Freeway Flyer, 1973, €125,000).
The fact that much abstract art is easy on the eye (and looks good above the
sofa) could be one of the attractions for some of the new buyers who have
entered the market since 2008, according to some in the trade. “It doesn’t seem
so long ago that figurative art was the latest fashion; now it’s good-looking
abstract,” one London dealer says. Others do not see the problem. “Who says
that decorative art is not also serious art? Matisse and virtually all of
Islamic tradition attest to the fact that it is or can be,” Robert Storr says,
adding: “Is Mondrian eye-candy?”
„Dans le cadre de la seconde édition du festival Normandie
Impressionniste consacrée au thème de l’eau, le musée des impressionnismes
Giverny organise une exposition « Signac, lescouleursde l’eau ».
Comme Claude Monet, PaulSignaca trouvé une source d’inspiration
constante dans l’évocation de l’eau et de sescouleurs. Depuis les
premières marines peintes sur le littoral normand avec une vigueur et une
liberté impressionnistes jusqu’aux amples architectures portuaires auxcouleursvives d’après-guerre, la description
de l’eau et du ciel offrirent àSignacun
inépuisable prétexte à multiplier les variations chromatiques.”….continuez
ici (site: Musée des Impressionnismes Giverny)
J´admire les oeuvres des impressionnistes beaucoup. Depuis dix ans,je
travaille á mon projet “des Images dans l´eau“. Je le regarde comme une
continuation de leur travail, avec des moyens d´aujourd´hui.
Color Field painting consciously distanced itself from
societal referents and focused on the lyrical possibilities of color.For the first time since
Impressionism, pure opticality held primacy over content and form.
Michael McNay from The
Guardian wrote:
Kenneth Noland, was one of the young artists tasked
with seizing the star-spangled standard from the preceding warrior generation
of Jackson Pollock and Mark Rothko and bearing it aloft into battle. Even more
than this, Noland enjoyed having Americans claiming him as the successor to the
mantle of Matisse, but in truth he had more in common with the Bauhaus
abstractionist Josef Albers, who moved to the US and taught Noland at Black
Mountain college, North Carolina. Noland disliked what he regarded
as Albers's doctrinaire approach, but his own practice of geometric
abstraction remained indelibly marked by the old German's influence.
Noland became celebrated in the 1950s for his series of concentric
circles in a dazzling array of colours; not, like the paintings of Jasper
Johns, targets, but circles as a simple geometric form that could demonstrate
an infinite number of colour combinations. Next came circles with blurred
edges, like blazing catherine wheels, diamond shapes, diamonds within circles,
chevrons and stripes. The message was
colour, usually pure and always simple.
Read more
Did you see the exhibition:
Colour Chart: Reinventing
Colour, 1950 to Today, Tate Liverpool
“Since there has been art, there have
been disagreements about colour – what it means, how to use it, whether it is a
good or bad thing.
Vasari
held that colore was Venetian, while disegno – roughly, drawing – was
Florentine and thus (Vasari was from Florence) better. The row rumbled on for
400 years: drawing was rational, clever, Poussin; colour was sensuous, sensual,
Rubens. And so things stood until the 20th century, when two changes took
place, the subject of a show called Colour Chart at Tate Liverpool.
The first change was
that the number and kind of colours available to artists mushroomed with
developments in paint-making. This wasn't just about stuff sold in art shops:
for the first time, artists took to buying colours from their local B&Q.
An early apostle of
household paint was Picasso, who waxed particularly lyrical about a commercial
enamel called Ripolin. The first burst of colour on the dowdy palette of
Analytic Cubism came courtesy of Ripolin, in Picasso's Violin, Glass, Pipe and
Anchor of 1912.
Largely, though, the
hues and tints of hardware paints were still used as a means to an end – to
convey mood or rhythm, or to reproduce the warmth of sun on brick. It was only
after the Second World War that the idea of color gratia coloris – colour for
colour's sake – took off, marking a second phase in the 20th century's
chromatic revolution.
Various things brought
this about. The first was a rebellion against the valuing of skill which had
held sway since Phidias. As far back as 1921, Aleksandr Rodchenko's Pure Red
Colour, Pure Yellow Colour, Pure Blue Colour, shown at Tate Modern earlier this
year, had hinted that the hand no longer counted in painting – that a canvas
covered in a single pigment was as valid a work as the Sistine Chapel ceiling.
Still, Rodchenko had made his statement in artist's oils. Now, nonart paints –
the kind of stuff anyone might buy and use for anything – brought the point
home.
Modernity wasn't going
to dwell in an ivory tower, or at least in academies and art museums. It was
going to be made in ex-light industrial lofts and factories, and its making
would be open to anyone with a tin of paint and a roller. (Or, in the case of
Dan Flavin and Donald Judd fluorescent tubes and a steel cutter.)
Commercial paints,
familiar to anyone who had ever decorated a spare room or sprayed a bent
fender, were a visible sign of what Colour Chart's curator, Ann Temkin, calls
the "de-skilling" of art. It was all very democratic, although, as
often with democracy, not completely so.
Actually, there were
three requirements to being a modern artist: a tin of paint, a roller and an
idea. Bound up in the dissing of the hand in art was a new fetishising of the
mind – a way of working that Sol LeWitt dubbed "conceptual". LeWitt's
Wall Drawing #918, a room-sized work, announces its intentions in eye-frying,
shop-bought colours, in the fact that it has a number rather than a name – it,
too, might have been ordered from a shop – and that it wasn't made by LeWitt
but by his assistants.
In the demotic phrase
of the builder's yard, Wall Drawing #918was contracted out, and looks it.
Changing attitudes towards colour in the 20th century aresummed up by a
sequence of three German artists.
In the Bauhaus of
the1930s, Josef Albers painted squares of Masonite, the chipboard of its day,
insub-squares of overlapping colours. The beauty Albers sought was of
systematisation, a literally chromatic scale to match a musical one. Forty
years later, Gerhard Richter up-ended Albers' thinking by painting pictures
that didn't just look like colour charts but actually were.
Works such as 1025
Colours are precisely what they claim to be: deadpan recreations of Pantone
sheets, a self-referring self-advertisement. Twenty years on from Richter,
Katharina Fritsch's Eight Paintings in Eight Colours (1991)shows the impossible
position Richter had left her in. If you're a chromatic painter, where do you
go from 1025Colours?
Fritsch's answer, a
snapshot of art in the 1990s, is to turn the question into a game by putting
single hues in big, academy frames”
ColourChart is that
engaging thing, a show that takes something familiar and, by focussing on it,
makes you see it afresh. By all means go.TateLiverpool (0151-702 7400) to 13 Sep
Here is another video of my work regarding color,form and space. This time I pay tribute to the great Mark Rothko. I have collected some information about what he and others said and wrote about his art,especially that of his late period..
In 1936, Rothko began writing a
book, never completed, about similarities in the art of children and the work
of modern painters." In this manuscript, he observed that "the fact
that one usually begins with drawing is already academic. We start with
color." Read more.
Rothko was using fields of color in
his aquarelles and city scenes, and his subject matter and form at this time
had become non-intellectual.
Fearing that modern American
painting had reached a conceptual dead end, Rothko was intent upon exploring
subjects other than urban and natural scenes. He sought subjects that would
complement his growing concern with form,
space, and color.
Rothko, in the middle of a crucial
period of transition, had been impressed by Clyfford Still's abstract fields of
color, which were influenced in part by the landscapes of Still's native North
Dakota ,He described his new method as "unknown
adventures in an unknown space", free from "direct association
with any particular, and the passion of organism".
It was at some point during the
winter of 1948 that Rothko happened upon the use of symmetrical rectangular
blocks of two to three opposing or contrasting, yet complementary, colors, in
which, for example, "the rectangles sometimes seem barely to coalesce out
of the ground, concentrations of its substance.Additionally, for the next seven
years, Rothko painted in oil only on large canvases with vertical formats. Very
large-scale designs were used in order to overwhelm the viewer, or, in Rothko's
words, to make the viewer feel "enveloped within" the painting
In 1949, Rothko became fascinated
byMatisse'sRed
Studio, acquired by the Museum of Modern Art that year. He later credited
it as a key source of inspiration for his later abstract paintings.
In these paintings, color and structure are
inseparable: the forms themselves consist of color alone, and their translucency
establishes a layered depth that complements and vastly enriches the vertical
architecture of the composition. Variations in saturation and tone as well as
hue evoke an elusive yet almost palpable realm of shallow space. Color,
structure, and space combine to create a unique presence. In this respect,
Rothko stated that the large scale of these canvases was intended to contain or
envelop the viewer--not to be "grandiose," but "intimate and
human." Read more.
Rothko's art reveals a distinct and personal interpretation of the
abstract expressionist style. From his first emergence as a mature artist, he
eschewed the gestural brushwork and the dense, painterly surfaces that became
celebrated in the work of De Kooning, Franz Kline, and others. Instead, Rothko
concentrated on expression through color alone, and to this end he radically
simplified his imagery. In his best paintings, the imagery consists of two or
three rectangles of color that float within an abstract space. Generally, the
areas of color dissolve softly into one another, denying all traces of either
hard or tactile edges. The softness is a function of the artist's delicate,
feathery brushstrokes, and it results in an expanding pictorial space that
seems to consist of pure color rather than colored objects. In many of Rothko's
paintings his colors appear to generate their own magical or divine light.Read more.
Sensing the futility of
words in describing this decidedly non-verbal aspect of his work, Rothko
abandoned all attempts at responding to those that might inquire after its
meaning and purpose, stating finally that silence
is "so accurate". His paintings' "surfaces are expansive and
push outward in all directions, or their surfaces contract and rush inward in
all directions. Between these two poles you can find everything I want to
say."
For Rothko, color is
"merely an instrument". The "multiforms" and the signature
paintings are, in essence, the same expression of "basic human
emotions", as his surrealistic mythological paintings, albeit in a more
pure form.
"In 1915, Malevich laid down the foundations of Suprematism when he published his manifesto From Cubism to Suprematism. In 1915--1916 he worked with other Suprematist artists in a peasant/artisan co-operative in Skoptsi and Verbovka village. In 1916--1917 he participated in exhibitions of the Jack of Diamonds group in Moscow together with Nathan Altman, David Burliuk and A. Ekster, The most amous examples of his Suprematist work is the Black Square .The first Black Square was painted in 1915 and became the turning point in the development of Russian avant-garde. (From Wikipedia) Malevich: "When, in the year 1913, in my desperate attempt to free art from the ballast of objectivity, I took refuge in the square form and exhibited a picture which consisted of nothing more than a black square on a white field, the critics and, along with them, the public sighed, "Everything which we loved is lost. We are in a desert... Before us is nothing but a black square on a white background!" "But this desert is filled with the spirit of nonobjective sensation which pervades everything."
Homage to the Square by Josef Albers
"Accomplished as a designer, photographer, typographer, printmaker and poet, Albers is best remembered for his work as an abstract painter and theorist. He favored a very disciplined approach to composition. Most famous of all are the hundreds of paintings and prints that make up the series Homage to the Square. In this rigorous series, begun in 1949, Albers explored chromatic interactions with nested squares. The optical effects Albers created—shimmering color contrasts and the illusion of receding and advancing planes—were meant not so much to deceive the eye as to challenge the viewer's faculties of visual reception. This shift in emphasis from perception willed by the artist to reception engineered by the viewer is the philosophical root of the Homage to the Square series. Albers tried to teach the mechanics of vision and show even the uninformed viewer how to see." (Cornelia Lauf and Wikipedia)
Herald Sun 10 november 2012 "A NEWLY discovered
alien planet seven times bigger than Earth may be able to support life,
astronomers wrote in a study. The
planet, dubbed HD 40307g, is one of only a few to be discovered
in the "habitable zone": a sweet spot, neither too close or too far
from its sun, where liquid water could exist, the team of international
astronomers, led by Mikko Tuomi, University of Hertfordshire, England, and
Guillem Anglada-Escude, University of Goettingen, Germany, wrote in the
journal,Astronomy and
Astrophysics.
The so-called "super-Earth" orbits its star - HD 40307, a dwarf just
slightly smaller, cooler and less bright than our sun - every 200 days.
It is relatively close to the solar-system neighbourhood, just 42 light years
away. A light year is equivalent to about 9460 billion kilometres.
"The star HD 40307 is a perfectly quiet old dwarf star, so there is no
reason why such a planet could not sustain an Earth-like climate,'' said
astronomer Guillem Anglada-Escude of the University of Goettingen in Germany.
The next step is to use powerful telescopes to study the planet more closely.
A large number of observations will be necessary to confirm any other
similarities with Earth, the astronomers said.
The study noted that the distance between the planet and its star is similar to
that between the Earth and the sun and that it is likely the planet rotates on
its axis, which would create a day and night cycle like ours.
So far, some 846 planets have been found outside our solar system since 1995,
using high-powered equipment, most notably the Kepler telescope, launched in
March 2009 to search for Earth-like planets.
Most of the discoveries are of planets far larger than Earth." The Daily Telegraph2012-11-08: A ''super-Earth'' that could have a life-supporting climate has been discovered in a multi-world solar system 42 light years from the Sun. Photo: Nasa 1:04PM GMT 08 Nov 2012 A ''super-Earth'' that could have a life-supporting climate has been discovered in a multi-world solar system 42 light years from the Sun. The planet, which is several times more massive than the Earth, lies just the right distance from its star to allow the existence of liquid surface water. It orbits well within the star's ''habitable'' or ''Goldilocks'' zone - the region where temperatures are neither too hot nor too cold to sustain life.... more »
US News Planet could be close enough to observe with conventional telescopes Scientists say they've detected a planet that could have life just 42 light-years from earth—close enough so that astronomers might someday be able to directly observe it through a telescope. [READ: NASA Observes Record-Setting GasStorm on Saturn] The "super Earth" is about seven times...
PhysOrg HARPS (HighAccuracyRadial velocityPlanet Searcher) on ESO's La Silla 3.6m telescope is a dedicated exoplanet hunter, able to detect the oh-so-slight wobble of a star caused by the gravitational tug of orbiting planets. Led by Mikko Tuomi of the UK'sUniversity of HertfordshireCentre for Astrophysics Research, a team of researchers reviewed publicly-available data from HARPS...
The Hindu Astronomers have discovered a new super-Earth planet around a nearby star that may have an Earth-like climate and be just right to support life. The new planet exists in the habitable zone of a nearby star and is part of a six-planet system. The system was previously thought to contain three planets in orbits too close to the star to support liquid water. By avoiding fake...
CNET You may think this planet is overpopulated or you may just be sick of the partisan politics. In either case, HD 40307g is an attractive getaway. by Less than 100 light years away, the new super-Earth could have fantastic beachfront properties. (Credit: Video screenshot by Tim Hornyak/CNET) It's only 42 light years away, it could have liquid water, and it's more than seven times...
The Daily Telegraph A young “homeless planet”, up to seven times the size of Jupiter and with no gravitational ties, has been spotted by scientists for the very first time. This Nasa illustration shows at night just before the predicted merger between our Milky Way galaxy and the neighbouring Andromeda galaxy, which is expected to happen about 3.75 billion years from now Photo:...
Zeenews London: Astronomers have discovered a new super-Earth planet around a nearby star that may have an Earth-like climate and be just right to support life. The new planet exists in the habitable zone of a nearby star and is part of a six-planet system. The system was previously thought to contain three planets in orbits too close to the star to support liquid water. By avoiding...
Belfast Telegraph A âsuper-Earthâ that could have a life-supporting climate has been discovered in a multi-world solar system 42 light years from the Sun. The planet, which is several times more massive...
Alles
im Fluss so lautet der Überschrift eines Zeitungsartikelsvon Andreas Rossmann in der FAZ vom 25.10.2012
,anlässlich der Ausstellung von Andreas Gursky im Düsseldorfer
Museum Kunstpalast.
Hier ein Abschnitt über Andreas Gurskys Serie "Bangkok"und „Ocean“ und danach einige Beispiele
aus meinem Fotoprojekt "Images in
Water" woran ich seit 2003 kontinuierlich arbeite und das ich in 2007
zum ersten Mal ausgestellt habe: „Auch„Bangkok“, die neueste, 2011
entstandene Fotoserie von Andreas Gursky, glänzt. Was „Bangkok“, neun große
Hochformate, je gut drei auf gut zwei Meter, mit Bangkok zu tun hat, erschließt
sich optisch nicht, denn Bangkok wird auf„Bangkok“ nicht erkennbar. Kein Palast
und kein Buddha, nur Wasser, und das uferlos, mit Lichtstreifen oder
Lichtmosaiken, die der dunkle, unruhige Grund zurückwirft, mal als gezackte,
gleißende Vertikale, deren grauer Schatten und orangefarbener Reflex parallel
laufen, mal als amorphe, scheinbar fliegende Flecken. Der Grund ist
schwarzweiß, dazwischen wimmeln kleine bunte, dunkelgelbe, türkis- und
rosafarbene Punkte und Einsprengsel.
Von der Stadt ist nichts zu sehen, nur der Fluss Chao Phraya, der sich finster
und schwerfällig durch sie wälzt und sie, so suggeriert der Titel
„Bangkok“,ganz in sich aufgenommen hat. Wie andere Flüsse in anderen Megacitys
führt er Unrat mit sich: Abfall und Astwerk, einen Autoreifen, eine
Plastikflasche und ein Präservativ, Zeitungs- und auch Blütenblätter -
Zivilisationsmüll, aber nicht als Mahlstrom, sondern in einzelnen Schnipseln.
Schwarz ist das Wasser, aber fließt es wirklich? Es könnte auch Lava oder Teer,
Öl oder Schlick sein. Abwasser. Sauber sieht anders aus.
Der Fluss reflektiert, quecksilbrig und unruhig. Die Oberfläche täuscht, ein
Verblendungszusammenhang. Ist es die Sonne oder ein Scheinwerfer, der den Fluss
anstrahlt? Was die Stadt nicht mehr braucht und ausstößt, wird vom Chao Phraya
aufgenommen, mitgeschoben. „Alles im Fluss“ erhält einen doppelten Sinn.
Hauptverkehrsader und ökologische Katastrophe, selbst glänzend und die
Kehrseite des Glanzes.
Der Fluss ist, wie ihn diese Fotos darstellen, auch schön - und das ganz
vordergründig und banal: Wie Lampions liegen und wippen die Lichter auf dem
Wasser. Gursky hat die Fotos am Computer bearbeitet, nachgeschönt? Ihre
Schönheit schärft ihren Schrecken. Nie war Gurskys Kunst der abstrakten
Malerei- Mark Rothko, Barnett Newman, Clyfford Still, Ellsworth Kelly, auch Cy
Twombly und Gerhard Richter - so nah.
Die „Bangkok“-Serie folgt den sechs „Ocean“-Bildern, die Gursky 2010 an die
Grenzen des Darstellbaren führten: Mehr Welt, und das in quantitativem Sinn,
als in diesen digital behandelten Satellitenbildern lässt sich auf einer
Fotografie nicht erfassen. Auf einem von ihnen ragen Madagaskar, die Spitze der
indischen Halbinsel, Sumatra und Westaustralien wie Fragmente in den riesigen,
in vielen Tiefen blau ruhenden Ozean.“ Wer Andreas Gurskys Kunst begegnen will, muss sich ins
Museum begeben. Im Katalog sind - nicht nur - die „Bangkok“-Fotos nicht groß
genug, um ihren Charakter als Suchbilder ausspielen zu können und etwa die
dümpelnden Abfallstücke erkennen zu lassen. Der Fotograf, der mit Aufnahmen von
Jackson-Pollock-Bildern oder Ausschnitten aus Gemälden eines John Constable
oder Vincent van Gogh die Malerei en detail reproduziert, verweigert sich der
Reproduzierbarkeit: Auch das ist ein Versuch Gurskys, der seine Bildfindungen
digital „ausarbeitet und präzisiert“, sich von der klassischen Fotografie zu
lösen und der Malerei anzunähern - als hätte sie sich nicht längst von ihr
emanzipiert und es immer noch nötig, die Konkurrenz mit ihr aufzunehmen und
ihren eigenen Kunstcharakter unter Beweis zu stellen." Ich arbeite bereits seit 16 Jahren´auf diese Weise. Damals habe ich mein erstes großes Fotoprojekt "Bilder
in Bäumen" / "Images
in Trees" vorgestellt.
Hier folgen
einige Videos von meiner Ausstellung „Alles im Fluss“ aus 2008:
Vivid Colors plays prismatic improvisations over the harmonies of the double rainbow and creates The Infinite Pictorial Space and exciting new worlds in the optical spectrum of light.
I ´ve made this slideshow on the occasion of the exhibition "Im Farbenrausch" - Munch,Matisse und die Expressionisten, at the Folkwang Museum in Essen.
I would also like to refer to the exhibition "Color Chart: Reinventing Color, 1950 to Today" at the MoMa in New York in 2008.
Color Chartcelebrates a paradox: the lush beauty
that results when contemporary artists assign color decisions to chance,
readymade source, or arbitrary system. Midway through the twentieth century,
long-held convictions regarding the spiritual truth or scientific validity of
particular colors gave way to an excitement about color as a mass-produced and
standardized commercial product. The Romantic quest for personal expression
instead became Andy Warhol's "I want to be a machine;" the artistry
of mixing pigments was eclipsed by Frank Stella's "Straight out of the
can; it can't get better than that."Color Chart is the first major exhibition devoted
to this pivotal transformation, featuring work by some forty artists ranging
from Ellsworth Kelly and Gerhard Richter to Sherrie Levine and Damien Hirst.
(from the MoMa website)
Organized by Ann
Temkin, Curator, Department of Painting and Sculpture, The Museum of Modern Art